Author: Jay Andrew

Good Monday Evening! We have had a busy week for the website. I have spent a lot of time behind the computer working on a few different things. When I took a break, I usually took a break to work on something website related. So first thing is first, we are rolling out a new resource The Ballistic Library .

This is my library of books that I have sitting on the shelf. I have collected them over the years and have read through them. Sometimes they are quite good and sometimes they are not as good as I would have liked. Either way, there they sit. This library will hopefully help people looking to build their own libraries. I am working on writing reviews for each entry, so you will know what you are getting. The first three reviews I’ve linked below.

Thoughts On: .50 Caliber Construction Manuel

Thoughts On: British 303 Do Everything Manuel

Thoughts On: Backyard Ballistics

The library is also a means to help support the site. Clicking on the links will take you to Amazon, where if you make a purchase, we will get a percentage at no extra cost to yourself. In the future we would like to build affiliate programs with Brownell’s, Natchez and Midway USA, so we can all keep the money within the firearms community, however we are still too small of a site to qualify. All in good time.

The second feature I’ve added is a commentary or opinion page. There is a lot that happens in the firearms world. New guns, new ammo, and an ever changing political landscape. Sometimes something bugs me, and I just need to get my opinion out there or want to highlight something I think is of particular importance. Often times these “Commentaries” are not related specifically to a project, or fit neatly into a category. So for this I have created Jay’s Commentary.

The first entry into Jay’s Commentary is a piece I wrote called What’s the Deal With Pistol Braces? Personally I do not agree with the stance that is being taken by many in the industry. I do not think it helps us at all to make this issue the hill we die on, as some seem to be willing to do. Not when we have a possible assault weapons ban on the horizon, and especially not when we are the ones who more or less abused what was suppose to be an aid to our wounded vets. Let’s focus on solving the real problem, the NFA, not quibble over poorly devised work arounds that pistol braces have come to represent.

I know that’s going to be a stick in some people’s craw that I am not jumping on board with both feet, but my position has not changed from when the issue was with bump stocks. People openly flaunted the law, openly discussed purchasing pistol braces as a means to get around the NFA. What did they expect to happen? As I said real victims here are the vets who benefitted from the legitimate use of these braces.

The new making the rounds that I really wanted to highlight was a new firearm rumored release coming from Kel-Tec. It appears they may have been planning a SHOT Show 2021 release of a new pistol referred to as the P50. The only teaser image I have seen is shown below.

Besides this image which has been reported on by many sites, there is little be found in the way of information. What surely must be a very front heavy pistol it will be interesting to see how practical this thing is. Kel-Tec has always made some interesting firearms, and I have not heard much bad about them, except to say they seem to have supply issues, meaning they cannot build them fast enough. As a company that’s not always a bad problem to have.

Given this is probably the third or forth US Firearm to be commercially manufactured to fire the 5.7x28mm it will be interesting to see if there is a company that will submit it to for standardization. It remains a CIP cartridge, and CIP standards are likely being followed by those who manufacture for it. Since a special lacquer is applied to the outside of the case in order to aid in feeding, it would be interesting to see how SAAMI incorporates this in the standard. CIP makes no mention of the coating, SAAMI may follow suit…we will see.

By the way here are some cartridges that have recently submitted to SAAMI which are of note (The full list can be found here);

• SIG 277 Fury – SAAMI MAP of 80,000psi – 135gr@3000fps from 16in Barrel
  • Special notes on the drawing advise that cartridge case and firearm must be of special design to handle the high pressure.
• 12 Gauge 1 3/4 Shot Shells – SAAMI MAP of 11,500psi – 1oz slug @1200fps from 30in barrel
  • Introduces a new chamber, which may mean we’ll see some “short” action shotguns?
• 6.8 Western – SAAMI MAP of 65,000psi – 175gr @2840fps from 24in Barrel
  • Looks to be a new short action cartridge.
• 6.5 Weatherby Rebated Precision Magnum – 140gr@3,075fps from 24in barrel
  • Curious as to why Weatherby went with a rebated rim?

That is all I have for this week. As always if you are looking to get in touch, best way is to send me an email jay@theballisticassistant.com. You may check us out on Parler, Facebook, Instagram, MeWe, and Reddit If you’d like to submit a load to our load database the instructions are here.

Stay Safe Out There!

The Ballistic Assistant

We are halfway through December and about two weeks left of 2020. 2020 has been both the longest and shortest decade of my life. It seems like this year has both dragged on and blazed by at the same time. Sad to say, it does not look like 2021 is shaping up to be much of a better, at least not as far as the firearms community is concerned.

The news that has been breaking over the weekend concerning the ATF’s raids on Polymer 80 has many of us concerned as to what the future might hold for 80% firearm receivers. From everything I have read, what seems to have the ATF’s ire is the kit being offered by Polymer 80 which included not just an 80% pistol frame, but also the jigs, tools, and parts needed to complete the pistol.

The frustrating part of this is the fact that the law has long been that the part considered a firearm, the frame or receiver, is the only part that requires a background check. Every other component in that kit can be purchased online/over the counter without any sort of paper work. If the frame or receiver is unfinished, or deemed to need at least 20% more work to finish it, then it is lawful to purchase it without filling out a 4473. The precedent that the ATF is trying to set is that “A kit” of parts and tools, accompanying a 80% firearm is essentially the same as a 81% firearm and should be treated the same. We know it’s only these kits, as that the only thing they’ve targeted, the rest of the Polymer 80 inventory is on sale right now.

The ATF is going so far as to request customer records, and then tracking down customers who have purchased these kits and demanding forfeiture in lieu of a obtaining a warrant and searching a homeowners house. If I was someone who had purchased on of these kits, and the ATF came up to my door demanding I hand it over or they will get a warrant to tear through my house, I would be inclined to turn it over. I completely understand where owners are coming from.

I strongly suspect we can see more of these shenanigan’s from the ATF over the next few years. Unfortunately there are lawyers who take definitions and laws which seem pretty clear to you and I, but argue to form these legal grey area’s. All it takes is one court case and a willing judge to redefine a that serves to only burden the law abiding. The frustrating part is it can take years and large amounts of $$$ for cases like these to work their way through the legal system. It’s all politically motivated garbage, that just further infuriate those in the firearms community.

If I was to guess what we are going to see in the next four years, here is my list.

1. ATF redefining a pistol brace to a stock, and classifying any weapon with a pistol brace an illegal SBR. (Before you think I’m going a bit far, look at what they did with Bump stocks…)
2. Reinterpreting the definition of pistol in order to limit the importation of firearms which currently fall under the “Pistol” version of long arms. This would include weapons like the CZ Scorpion EVO, AR-15 variants, and PCC pistol configurations.
3. Another hard look at M855 ammunition, that has long enjoyed a sporting exemption. This came under fire back in 2015/2016 but ultimately retain its exemption.
4. A further slow down in NFA transfers. Current wait times for paper transfers are around 9 to 12 months, while electronic transfers typically take 1 to 2 months. It would not at all surprise me to see the ATF change it’s rules on individual ownership and trusts to further burden the process.
5. A hard look at the definition of 80% and homemade firearms. This includes 3D Printing or sharing of CAD models, and prints online.

I also anticipate we will see at least one or two more big pushes for a so called “Assault” Weapons Ban (AWB) in the first two years of a Biden/Harris administration. Two years from now, are elections which are projected to be favorable to the GOP. If this election was any indication, we are likely to see the House flip Red, which will help (not totally prevent) any sort of AWB from being enacted. If the GOP retains the Senate in January, we may stand a better chance at preventing an AWB, but I would not bet a dime on it. There are two many GOP senators which are pretty tepid on firearms.

From all indications should an AWB come to the floor in the House, it will far more reaching and more restrictive then the 1994 bill that expired in 2004. While many in the firearms community will cast their hopes to the conservative majority on the Supreme Court, this is not the sure bulwark some believe it to be. If the Bills that have been submitted in the past are any indication, we can expect pretty much every semi-automatic rifle, most shotguns and a good deal of pistols to be affected by this change. It is unclear to me at this time if there is any grandfather provisions for existing firearms.

Biden has already announced his support for $200 tax stamp on firearms that fall under these arbitrary Assault Weapon definitions and are in current circulation. Further more he wants to enact a tax stamp on each magazine that holds over 10 rounds. Ten mags, that is $2,000 dollars, in tax stamps. I think I tallied it up, and I was well over $10,000 in tax stamps for what I owned should this legislation go through. My collection is not all that big compared to many I know. Do not lie to yourself, they know full well the impact of this legislation will create a financial burden so large for most firearm owners, that firearm owners will opt to destroy their mags, hide them, or turn them in. Which ever you do, it has the same effect, removing these magazines out of circulation.

Unfortunately it is hard to talk about firearms and stay completely out of politics because the two have become so intertwined, to the point what is legal one year, can turn you into a felon in the next year if you are not paying attention. Being involved with organizations like the Gun Owners of America, or the 2nd Amendment Foundation is about the only way to keep tabs on what’s going on.

As far as other news goes, I have been quite busy with trying to find some work. Both of my consulting contracts have fallen through, one permanently the other one has just been delayed. In the mean time we’ve still got bills to pay and lives to live and all that takes a bit of money. So I’ve become a full time job seeker, at least until things pick back up again. That has once again put a bit of a delay on some of my other projects. We’ll continue to work on them as we have time and post updates here.

As always if you are looking to get in touch, best way is to send me an email jay@theballisticassistant.com. You may check us out on Parler, Facebook, Instagram, MeWe, and Reddit If you’d like to submit a load to our load database the instructions are here.

Thanks Again for Subscribing!

Stay Safe Out There

The Ballistic Assistant

Good Monday Evening!

I was reviewing some of the draft write ups I had been working on and realized I did not publish the first sight in attempt on the VZ-58. I have since corrected that issue, the write up is now live and can be accessed at the following link.

VZ-58: Accuracy Expectation and Sight In (1st Attempt)

For me the big news actually comes from a sister site my wife and I have been working on. We have been wanting to set up a business offering freeze dried goods for sometime. However we now just pulled the trigger on it and the site went live this past Friday. We approach freeze drying a bit differently, where we do not freeze dry meals, but all of the ingredients so you can make your own meals. It’s a new site, we’re still working through proofing and setting things but it is live and we’ve been processing orders. You can check out the site here.

The Southeast Homestead

As far as firearms news, it’s been fairly quite over the last week, I have not seen any big announcements or new releases. I’ve been busy helping my wife with the site so I have not had time for much else. Weather wise it rained a good part of last week so even in the little free time I had I was not able to get out to test fly the drone. It’ll all happen in good time.

Just a short update for this week. As always if you are looking to get in touch, best way is to send me an email jay@theballisticassistant.com. You may check us out on Parler, Facebook, Instagram, MeWe, and Reddit If you’d like to submit a load to our load database the instructions are here.

Thanks for being a Subscriber!

Stay Safe Out There!

The Ballistic Assistant

Jay’s Note to the Reader; When I originally wrote this post my impression of “How to Talk to Your Cat About Gun Safety” was taken at face value. The cover of the book was good for at least one laugh, which it got from this gun toting, feline loving, bearded guy. However a reader informed me that the contents of the book is far less innocent. Having not read the book myself, I cannot endorse it, nor can I endorse it’s contents. As I have researched it further, I believe the Author intended this to be a satirical commentary on Alt-Right issues, and this is reinforced when examining The American Association of Patriots website. Either way, whether is satire or not, it is not wholly consistent with the theme of this website. I have made the decision to remove the Amazon link to the product and have added this commentary. Take the cover at face value, it’s good for at least one smile….after all that was my original intent.

Good Cyber Monday! I’ve been busy over the last week and do have some updates that went live. Before we get into it, here’s something that is bound to make you smile.

We are working on getting affiliate programs set up for this website, and some of the other websites we’ve been working on. Amazon is probably the most well known affiliate program and easiest to set up as they do not have a minimum traffic requirement. We tried to apply for the Brownell’s affiliate program but were turned down due to limited traffic. Obviously we’d like to support the industry when ever we can, so we’ll continue to work on the website and reapply after we have grown a bit.

We looked at doing a Patreon, but I could not justify doing it. I am not set up to do exclusive content. We do not particularly like website banners, flashing advertisements, or popup windows. Instead will look at providing links to some of the items we like or we use in projects or around in our reloading room. We will see how this works, hopefully we will raise a little money for our next rifle build.

We have also updated the Burn Rate Chart to include two additional powders that somehow we missed. N555, and Sport Pistol. N555 is a slower burning double based rifle powder marketed by Vihtavuori. It is most suitable for 6.5 Creedmoor, or similar cartridges. Sport Pistol is an Alliant powder, with a burn speed similar to that of Bullseye, depending on the load it is either a very similar burn speed or a little slower. Remember a burn rate chart indicates relative burn speed, and should not be the primary source for developing loads.

In other project news, we’ve received the final parts for the drone and are working out a few of the final bugs before the test flight. I hope to have that initial flight this week weather pending. We’ve already seen the limitations of the current design, namely it’s a bit small to fit everything we wanted in it. I’ve already finished the initial redesign of the airframe, which we have dubbed Spear XL.

We’d like to thank the folks over at reddit, the website really blew up this week as the link to the VZ-58 build was shared there. There are a few loose ends we need to tie up to completely finish that project. We are hoping to finish that up in the next few months. It’s been a popular project, and we are looking forward to tackling our next rifle build.

Lastly, we added a new section to the website that was suggested by one of our subscribers. We added a Mail Bag section. You can submit questions, topics or suggestions to the website through the contact form listed. This saves a step, as you do not have to open a email client. Secondly we will begin posting some of these conversations. Of course we will protect your privacy, first names only and we will not share your email address.

As always if you are looking to get in touch, best way is to send me an email jay@theballisticassistant.com. You may check us out on Parler, Facebook, Instagram, and I am also on MeWe, and now we’re on Reddit If you’d like to submit a load to our load database the instructions are here.

Thanks for being a Subscriber!

Stay Safe Out There!

The Ballistic Assistant

It’s the Monday before Thanksgiving, and there’s a lot to be thankful for. I’m not sure if it’s been an eventful year because of the pandemic or if it’s been an eventful year despite the pandemic. Either way it’s been a hell of a ride. We appreciate everyone who’s stuck with us.

I cannot remember if I mentioned the news about the 2021 SHOT Show being cancelled. It happened around the time we were moving, and getting settled in. So many of the big announcements that were likely being saved for the SHOT Show are being trickled out now. (This actually has been the industry norm for sometime, but more so now that SHOT is not happening)

Vihtavuori has release the N550 power. This is an addition to their N series of powders which are double based rifle powders. They cover the full burn rate from fast burning rifle powers and slow burning magnum powders. I personally am a fan of N570 in 338 Lapua as it is one of the few powders I can hit 2700fps with 300gr pill and a 24in barrel. However N570 is difficult to meter with traditional powder throwers, N565 is suppose to be and improvement but I have not tried it yet. You can find more information on their N500 series of powders here.

There continues to be waves made about True Velocity’s ammunition. Last years SHOT Show had the announcement that they were teaming up with Sierra Bullets to offer a line of polymer cased ammunition for the commercial market. These cases are a bit unique as they have a steel case head, with a polymer case molded around the head. The more current news is they are joining SAAMI as a voting member, and they are working with both Australian and the US Military. All of this was reported by The Firearms Blog.

Having True Velocity as a member of SAAMI is likely a very good thing for the industry. Since SAAMI establishes voluntary guidelines that the majority of US Manufactures adhere to, we are likely to see some new SAAMI guidelines on the manufacture and testing of polymer cases. The big benefit to polymer cases over brass is the weight and the reduced cost. It might not seem a big deal to hunters, but to soldiers on the ground, a load out of 200+ rounds weighs a fair amount. Reducing that by 60%+ is potentially a big deal and could allow a solider to carry more ammunition, or maintain the same load out, and cover ground faster with less fatigue.

A year ago (I know it was an eternity ago) Sig Sauer was promoting their new 3 part case design in the 277 Fury, which boasts a service pressure of 80kpsi and uses a combination of steel and brass to lighten the ammunition while boosting performance. True Velocity is promoting their 6.8TVCM for military contracts and it seems they are trying to compete somewhat with the Sig 277 Fury, as this has been their statement to multiple publications.

True Velocity’s ammunition – and particularly our 6.8 TVCM cartridge – are changing the paradigm,” Tedford said. “It turns out you don’t have to operate at unsafe chamber pressures in order to generate increased velocity, enhanced terminal performance and improved accuracy. Our cartridge achieves all of these things, while maintaining safe operating pressures and drastically reducing the overall cartridge weight.”

True Velocity President Chris Tedford

Personally I still see some limitations of polymer case ammunition, which will not be foreign to anyone who is familiar with firearms design and their workings. For one, the spent cartridge case acts as a heat sink and by ejecting the case you are ejecting a lot of latent heat that would otherwise be soaked up by the chamber. This is one of the design failures of most caseless ammunition. Plastic is not a particularly good conductor of heat, so what mechanism will be that heat sink and allow for sustained fire without over heating the barrel? Is the steel case head a sufficient heat sink? The second problem I have is the melting point of most polymers is well within operational temps of many automatics. What does this ammunition do when it is left in a hot chamber at the end of a firefight? None of these issues are groundbreaking revelations, I’m just curious as to the solution.

It is still something to see if polymer cased ammunition is accepted in the commercial market. I for one have preference for ammunition that I can reload. I will pay a little extra to buy Boxer primed ammunition over Berdan primed ammunition, unless I’m tight on cash, and low on reloads, it would be hard for me to justify purchasing poly cased ammo. Further more a lot of people see polymerization of many items lessens the quality of that item. It took time before polymer framed firearms became the mainstay of the firearms world, and people still dog on the introduction of polymer framed variations of their metallic counterparts. I suspect a good deal of the market may be like that until the it is adopted in some form or fashion by the US Military. Like it or not, when it comes to trends in firearms the success or failure in US Military trials has a big weigh in on whether or not a new idea gains steam or falters.

Bringing this back home to updates on projects. We are 95% of the way there on conducting our first test flight. We received the spare batteries and props from Flite Test today. I am waiting on an airspeed sensor. The original one I ordered, I couldn’t get to work with the Pixhawk Cube flight controller. I’m still not sure why, but I ordered another one from a different company so we will see. Should arrive this week, maybe next if USPS is as slow as it was on this last package.

The construction of the thing has been a small lesson on trying to get lots of different components to talk and work together. It has been a bit of a challenge and it has been fun. We’ll have a write up detailing some of these challenges and also what our solutions were. We will also include the results of the first few flights, or first flight if we crash. We still have to add in the airspeed sensor and perform some final calibrations prior to that. Exciting times.

That is all for this week. As always if you are looking to get in touch, best way is to send me an email jay@theballisticassistant.com. You may check us out on Parler, Facebook, Instagram, and I am also on MeWe, but I have not done much with it yet. If you’d like to submit a load to our load database the instructions are here. I may be updating this form in the future to streamline the submission, for now continue to use the spreadsheet.

Thanks for Subscribing and Stay Safe Out There!

The Ballistic Assistant

Most of the past two weeks have been spent working on the drone, and the accompanying website. I pretty much picked up where I left a year ago and have been ordering and assembling everything together. There have been a few issues that I’ve had to work out. However nothing that has been substantial. A few days ago I put together a write up detailing everything that had been done to date.

Photogrammetry Drone: Putting Everything Together

There is some additional work to be done, mainly the final touches prior to test flight. We will also need to find a suitable test field to fly on and put together a mission plan. The nice thing about the autopilot is we should be able to get a tremendous amount of data on how the flight went. Everything from airspeed to battery life. We will use the data to evaluate changes we make to the airframe, especially as we look to integrate the camera into the build.

Looks like we won’t get the props until the 18th, so any test flight will have to occur after that date. I’ll have additional write ups to discuss the lead up to, and the results of the test flights.

In terms of firearms news. A friend and I had an interesting discussion regarding calibers, barrel length and elk. He wanted me to talk him out of purchasing a 45-70 lever gun. He was concerned his 308 Ruger American rifles with a 18in barrel wasn’t enough to do the job. He was considering either purchasing a 45-70 or another Ruger American with a 24in barrel, chambered in 308 Win. He stated that he wanted a rifle that he could comfortable take an elk from 0 to 300 yards. (My first response was his beard was not long enough and he did not live in a log cabin in the mountains to justify the 45-70)

I stated to him that I believed that he would be fine with the 18in 308 Win, especially if he switched to a 150gr monolithic bullet such as a Barnes TTSX or a Hornady GMX. The reason being the copper monolithic tend to penetrate deeper, track straighter and have less mass lost when compared to a a conventional cup and core lead bullet. After getting off the phone with him, I decided to run the ballistics to see if my statement was accurate or if I was just blowing smoke.

At the muzzle, there is no doubt that the 45-70 Govt. has the energy to take down an elk. However due to the flat nose bullet design of the 250gr Barnes TSX Bullet, the energy is lost quickly. As we approach 200 yards we drop below the 1500ftlb of energy that the Colorado Parks and Wildlife recommend as the minimum amount needed to reliably down an elk. In addition the bullet drop on the 45-70 is pretty dramatic, nearly twice that of the 308 Win at 300 yards.

The differences between the 308 Win barrel lengths is less dramatic. The criteria is from 0 to 300 yards as that what my friend felt were the ranges he’d be shooting. So if we look at the energy requirements we see both bullets make the cut off but the 18in barrel squeaks by at that 1500ftlb threshold while the 24in barrel imparts 1700lbs or a difference of around 13%. Now, is the elk likely to notice if it go hit with a bullet with 200lbs more force? No, I don’t believe so. The terminal ballistics are going to be very similar.

There is one thing that does matter which is the minimum velocity needed to reliably expand. Nosler claims there minimum expansion velocity is 1800fps. What I don’t know is the level of expansion you get at 1800fps. Is that the expansion that yields the picture perfect expansion you seen in the magazine photos or is that just enough to open up the tip to claim the bullet expanded. (Perhaps a couple test shots are needed with some wet newspaper). With the 1800fps spec provided, we can say that the 18in barrel will meet the spec yielding 2023fps.

At the end of the day, I told him he did not need to buy at 45-70 Govt. and that he was likely fine with the 18in barrel. Now that I’ve taken the time to run the numbers, I am more confident in the conclusion. His 165 Nosler Partition load will be fine for elk when shot from his 18in American Predator. Yes the energy threshold is just barely there, but as long as he does his part to place the bullet in the proper location he will fill the freezer.

So how about my advice on the loads? Switching from the 165gr Nosler Partition Bullet to a 150gr Monolithic? Well, I substituted a 150gr Barnes TTSX, and adjusted the load using QuickLOAD to get an estimated velocity of 2515fps. Since the bullet is a little bit lighter we get a bit of a velocity boost.

The minimum velocity for expansion for the Barnes 150gr TTSX is 2000fps, when purchased as a handloading component. The bullet used in their 308 and 30-06 factory loads have an expansion window down to 1600fps, but to my knowledge, is not sold as a handloading component. So he is likely on the edge for the stock 308 150gr TTSX handloading bullet on store shelves.

As far as terminal ballistics goes, it is true that the copper monolithic penetrate deeper, track straighter, and retain more weight when compared to traditional lead core hunting bullets. Undoubtedly the 1500ftlb minimum was set with traditional bullets in mind, and the advancement in bullet technology may reduce the amount of energy needed for an ethical kill. That is up to an individual hunter to decide. I am not convinced it will make as big of a difference as I initially had thought.

Well that is all I have for this week. We did decide to move to Parler, but are keeping our Facebook and Instagram account live for now. You can find us @TheBallisticAssistant. We are looking at MeWe, but haven’t finished the set up over there yet. For right now we are treating Parler kind of like Instagram sharing photos but we may expand how we use the platform. We will see.

As always, you can reach me at jay@theballisticassitant.com. Email me with your comments suggestions or questions. I have no new updates for the load database this week but if you’d like to add your pet load, the submission sheet can be found here and we will get it added ASAP.

Thanks for subscribing!

Stay Safe Out There!

The Ballistic Assistant

Well, I fat fingered something and lost the whole update. *Facepalm* Here we go again…

We will stay away from the election results. Though we do not expect that the ammo/component/firearm shortage will ease anytime soon. So that’s going to be fun for us.

Moving to Texas has been a change of scenery for myself. Utah is in the midst of a snow storm, and I can’t step outside without breaking a sweat. The humidity is a bit much for me in November. It scares me to think this is mild compared to what it can be. I’ll get used to it. We are working on settling in, part of that is going to be checking the sites on my rifle.

Changes in atmospheric conditions can have dramatic effects on downrange ballistics. Moving from an average elevation of 5500 feet to 350 feet is about as dramatic of a change as you can get. Air is more dense down here, which means drag is going to be higher. The bullet is going to lose more velocity at a given range, and the point of impact will be lower as a result. The effect will be more noticeable at range. Which is why I am a protenant of a 100 yard zero, but checking the rifle at range you actually expect to shoot at. The table below reinforces that point.

I know people who have spent serious $$$ on a limited hunt. They lived in Utah and planned on hunting somewhere close to sea level. They spent a ton of time working up a load, developing and checking a ballistics table, and then when they get their they check their rifle’s zero on a hundred yard target. Well, it should surprise no one that they felt their rifle was just fine.

As long as they were taking game at or under 400 yards, they are probably going to be ok. The difference is about an inch. At this distance, if you are shooting 1 MOA, which is the absolute best most experience shooters can hope to do in the field, you are noticing a 1 inch shift down in your point of aim/point of impact. given group sizes are going to be around 4in, this may not be immediately noticeable.

However this changes as you begin to past 500 yards, where this point of impact shift becomes 2 inches. At 600 yards it’s 4 inches, at 7 yards its 6 inches, and by the time you hit 8 yards it is more then 1 MOA difference (Mind you these are results from my 338LM, other calibers such as 45/70 could be more dramatic). It’s arguable that you shouldn’t be taking game past 500 yards anyways, but people do it, and if you are planning on it, you should know the variables which will affect shot placement.

Shooting competition is where these differences are really going to be noticeable. You cannot check the rifle at 100 yards an have any confidence that things are on. You must check at the ranges you will be shooting at. Notably if you are someone who likes to run heavy for caliber bullet weights. High elevations are more forgiving of bullets that are riding the edge of the stability envelope. You might get by running a 90gr 223 cal bullet in a 1:7 twist at 6000 feet. However you drop down to 300 feet above sea level and the bullet will start to key hole.

Running heavy for caliber bullets is a trick some competition shooter use, as bullets have slight imbalances that can cause groups to open up a bit the faster you spin them. If you spin them just enough to stabilize but not a revolution more, you can sometimes get slightly better groups. It might be enough to eek out a win over the competition, or so proponents say. However it will bite you, if you’re shooting at a range that’s at a different elevation. Sometimes all it takes is shooting a match during a cold morning to upset these loads.

There are other variables that can affect things. A notable one is the companies published B.C values. We all rely on them to generate that initial bullet drop chart. However the company doesn’t typically shoot them in all atmospheric conditions. For example Barnes Bullets shoots must of their data at a range in Price, Utah. How does the B.C compare to that of a bullet shot in Backwoods, Georgia? These are all variables that can only be taken into account by shooting and developing a table in the actual environment you intend to shoot in.

Lucky for me, I really only have one precision rifle I shoot. I’ll check and adjust the tables on my Barret MRAD, but the rest of my rifles have either iron sights or they are something I do not plan to shoot at distance with. The 30-06 I have, has only a 10x scope on it, and I would find it hard taking shots at more then 400 yards, so I’m not terribly worried about it. Perhaps when I have a developed pet load for the rifle I’ll develop a drop table for it.

In other news I have been busy with putting the drone together. We started this project about a year ago but ended up shelving it. Well now that I’m putting together a business that centers around drone surveying, it’s a good time to finish it. Kind of a key component of the whole operation.

Professional drones cost quite a bit of dough, and many of them use the same off the shelf components that I’ve ordered. For this reason I’m building my own. It will reduce maintenance costs, and operations costs as long as I am successful. Given this technology is mostly DYI, and there is plenty of information out there, I find it hard to believe I’m going to have substantial issues getting it in the air.

I plan on working on this over the next few weeks hopefully having a successful test flight sometimes next week and able to carry out surveys Thanksgiving weekend. Accompanying this has been the development of a website for the business showcasing some of the work I’ve done for other companies. If I can make enough money to support my family, I’ll call it a success. We will see.

Its all related to ballistics, even if it is a different field. Hopefully some people will enjoy seeing this project finished and flying, even if its a bit off the normal topic of the website.

As some have notices there is a concerted effort to move people from Facebook to Parlor. I have not decided whether or not I will make the change. There have been similar efforts in the not so distant past. They seem to be somewhat limited to the firearm’s community and has always been in response to Facebook’s crack downs on content. This time feels a bit different, there seems to be a larger movement, though it seems to be limited to those of a more conservative mindset. These campaigns do not typically work, as the reach on alternate platforms never comes close to what the reach on Facebook is. From a business aspect, if the people aren’t there, it doesn’t make sense to invest in it.

I am considering doing doing both a Parlor page and a Facebook page, I’ll provide and update next week on what we come up with. For now you can check us out on Facebook, Instagram or you can send us a email at jay@theballisticassistant.com. As always I welcome the feedback. If you have a new load to add to the database, you can do it here.

Stay Safe Out There!

The Ballistic Assistant

Today is election day, which for the United States happens once every two years. There is no secret that my political views are more conservative leaning, with that said I do try and be somewhat a-political in running the site. Hopefully, everyone has had a chance to go vote, make their voice heard, if not for the presidential election, for the down ticket candidates and ballot measures. In most States, that is what where your voice matters most.

We got to Texas early, we left mid day Sunday, drove all day, spent the night in New Mexico, and then drove all day Monday arriving to our destination about 2am Tuesday morning. We are beat, the last week has been a whirlwind of activity, culminating in about 24 to 26 hours of driving. We were fortunate, we fit everything we intended to. We have not even began to unpack, so who knows what survived and what did not. Either way we achieved our goal and got to our destination prior to the election results rolling out. I did not want to be caught out on the highways if chaos ensued.

In industry news, there has been quite a bit of noise made over the ATF’s recent determination letters and indications that they might be changing the rules, this time in regards to pistol braces, and pistols. A recent determination letter to Q, LLC which manufactures the Honey Badger pistol, stated that the pistol brace effectively was a stock and thus they were selling a SBR.

Controversy over the pistol brace is hardly a new thing. I am young enough to remember that the ATF issued a ruling stating that “Shouldering” a pistol brace is effectively redesigning the weapon into an Short Barrel Rifle. The ATF backed down from that interpretation, but honestly I have been waiting to see this issue come back up again, especially when the ATF reclassified Bump Stocks as machine guns.

Instead of focusing on the the Pistol Brace or on the Bump Stock, I think the real issue is more how the ATF is making determinations. This is clear as they have made indications they are revisiting what is constituting a “Pistol”. There has been some hay made over the definition of pistol, specifically that at pistol is designed to be held “By one hand”. However pistols and rifles are both often “held” by one hand, and “fired” using two hands. To you and I, this would be splitting hairs, but lawyers bread their butter by splitting such hairs.

This is the danger of broad bureaucratic powers that have been granted to the executive branch by the legislator. They are able to define and redefine how they interpret and enforce the laws at whim, and they are not bound by precedent. Groups pushing more firearm laws have been pushing bans on pistols which have a magazine outside of the pistol grip. On the national level these bans have failed, however I strongly suspect they have approached the attorneys at the ATF and are working to have the ATF interpret the law in a way that accomplishes, in part, the same thing, without having to go through the legislator.

It is my sincere hope that the 2nd Amendment Foundation, and other similar groups are able to push back against this behind the scenes effort. I strongly suspect the outcome of such efforts will be tied to the outcome of this election, which is not how it should be for something that is a constitutional Right.

Well, we are watching results come in. Over the next few weeks I’ll be working on another website, so I do not expect to have significant updates. As always we will keep top on of the Load Database, if you have some load results to submit, email me, jay@theballisticassistant.com. You can join the conversation on Facebook, or check out our latest doings over on the Instagram.

Stay Safe Out There

The Ballistic Assistant

We are one week out from the big move. The garage is looking cleaner, the house is looking emptier and we are counting down the days. It is going to be a big change for me, I’ve live in Utah for about 40% of my life. Basically all of my adult life, so moving to Texas is going to be a bit of an adjustment.

However this recent cold snap, has convinced me that maybe Texas will be a welcome change this time of year. Winter sure came on quick and it came on hard. It’s likely going to pick our route for us, while I am incline to go I-70 thru to Kansas and then hit I-35 south through Dallas, the recent winter storm is making me think perhaps going south through Arizona, New Mexico, and West Texas might be the better option. I’ve gone both routes, and I like sticking to the highways, but going over the continental divide towing a trailer, in a possible snow storm is not my preference. We will see.

We are trying to make a push to get moved prior to the election results being announced. I really do not want to have to drive through anywhere that people might be acting out there opinions over who won, and who lost. This means we will likely be hitting the road on Monday, and arriving to our destination east of College Station Tuesday evening. So there will likely be no update to the website next week, given that I wanted to take a moment to update it tonight.

In packing up much of my reloading stuff, I’ve come across many gems. One of them I posted to Instagram the other night. A Littleton Shotmaker. I bought it sometime in 2014, about the same time I bought my Benelli M4, and a Lee 1oz slug mold. The obvious thought here was that I was going to start churning out my own shotgun ammo. Well, I don’t think I loaded more then two or three dozen shells, and had several failures before I decided perhaps I’m not as into shot shell reloading as I am in metallic cartridge reloading.

To be fair I will likely revisit the shot shell reloading hobby sometime in the future. However I do not know that I’ll fire up this shot maker unless I have something close to an unlimited source of lead. I felt like it took me at least 1/2 hour for the thing to start making shot, and then another 1/2 for it to make “Good” shot, and by the end of an hour I had run 20lbs of lead through the thing, and I had a hell of a time figuring out how to QA/QC the darn stuff. Clearly I need to spend some more time working with it, but at the end of the day I just don’t shoot enough shotgun shells to justify it.

Someone once offered to trade me a Colt HBAR for the shot maker. At the time the shot maker was too new. I was still convinced I just needed to spend a bit more time with it to justify the expense, I pass it up. Now in hindsight, I wish I had not. If you are someone who is decent at casting, would like to take on a bit of a challenge, and has a lot of time and lead on hand, you might think about emailing me. I might be convinced to part with this for the right deal.

Everyone has that story, where they wanted to take things to the next level, and then found out, maybe they were fine with the level they were at. Another conversation I have had with more then a few people is how much time and to what level of precision to prep brass with. I used to be there, where I wanted to get everything just right. Ever single case needed the exact same overall length, the powder had to be weighed out to the exact same charge, and the flash holes had to be completely burr free. If a case looked out of place, I lost all confidence that the batch would shoot well.

Working in the industry cured me of that mentality, quick. Brass could be +/- .005in on case length, bullet seating could be off as much as .010in from spec, and the charge weight’s could very as much as a grain but yet everything produced tight clover leaf groups. It almost became a curiosity as to what parameters were the most important in order to get accurate ammunition. In the end, I decided what was most important was a quality bullet, a good rifle, and good rifleman.

While we bicker over what will tighten a group up by .1in, the reality is, that is really difficult to measure. Bench rest shooters sometimes times win or lose by .01in, but that is not reflective of what our rifles, and what we as shooters can accomplish in most scenarios. Do we need honestly need to fret about that .002″ or .003″ variation in case length? I would argue no, but I know there is one thing at play here that is hard to measure. It’s a mental game to many people, a form of OCD. If they do not feel they have taken every measure to produce the best ammunition they feel they can produce, then as they line up on target, a little voice in the back of their head will say “That extra .2gr of powder is going to send this shot high.” The shot inevitably will go high by a .25 MOA, and you will never forgive yourself, regardless if the flyer was resultant of a 0.1% difference in charge or not.

That is all I have for thoughts this week. Just a reminder, my new email address is jay@theballisticassistant.com, if you forget, jayandrew338@gmail.com still is live. If you have a new load to submit, the sheet it found here. If you feel like saying “Hi” shoot me an email or check us out on Facebook.

Stay Frosty out there, and as always, stay safe.

The Ballistic Assistant

Good Wednesday Evening,

Its been a busy few weeks. Three weeks ago I was unpacking things and planning for a reloading space. These past two weeks we’ve reversed course. Because we’re moving to Texas, I’ve had to develop four piles, the junk pile, the donate pile, the packing pile and the sell pile. Have to slim things down, renting a trailer is not cheap.

There has been some work in the background. I am in the works of starting a new business focusing on aerial surveying, and expanding some of the consulting work I’ve been doing for the metal/non metal mining industry. Part of this is developing a new website for the business which means I needed to upgrade the Bluehost account to accommodate a second website. This upgrade comes with an email domain. So I’ve changed my primary contact information for this website from jayandrew338@gmail.com to jay@theballisticassistant.com. It might take me a bit to update everything, but there will be a transition.

Both email accounts are live, so if you send something to either email you’ll get a response from me. I appreciate the feedback and the suggestions. Keep them coming.

Back to the topic of packing, how do you store your spent/prepped brass? For a long time I used gallon and 3 gallon bags. This worked for sometime until I had so much brass, I had to switch to tote. I bought a bunch of totes and tried to organize it all only to have to find space to put all the totes. The problem with plastic bags is the rip too easy, and the problem with totes is they take up a lot of space.

I’ve decided to use my vacuum sealer to store brass. The vacuum packing is overkill, but what isn’t is the the thickness of the bags. They are a bit thicker, and you can seal the brass in. The bags are easy to stack, and you can pick up the bag without fear of it ripping. No I don’t actually suck the air out of the bag, but I do press it out and then use the heat sealing function to seal the end of the bag. I know it’s a pain to open a bag and not be able to reseal it, but for brass that you don’t load for very often, or excess brass that you’ll rotate in at some point, it does seem to be the best of both worlds.

As I’ve been packing, I was able to find my stash of primers. As such, I am open to trades, I know what I got so no haggling. I’m looking for a Barret M107 with accompanying suppressor. No suppressor no deal. 😛

Thanks for the messages of support. We are looking forward to this move and the new challenges and opportunities that it will bring. As always you can reach out to us at Facebook, check us out on Instagram, or now email us at jay@theballisticassistant.com.

Stay Safe Out There!

The Ballistic Assistant